<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ponystyle Industries &#187; photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ponystyle.com/blog/category/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ponystyle.com/blog</link>
	<description>Brian Hardy's Internet façade</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Flickr vs. Color Profiles: Old News for Some</title>
		<link>http://ponystyle.com/blog/2006/06/20/flickr-vs-color-profiles-old-news-for-some/</link>
		<comments>http://ponystyle.com/blog/2006/06/20/flickr-vs-color-profiles-old-news-for-some/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hardy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ponystyle.com/blog/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been irked for a while over the fact that lots of the images I upload to Flickr look washed out in comparison to what I see on my computer. At first I thought this was due to gamma issues and was assuming that maybe my browser didn&#8217;t recognize settings or something like that. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been irked for a while over the fact that lots of the images I upload to <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/lyricsboy">Flickr</a> look washed out in comparison to what I see on my computer. At first I thought this was due to gamma issues and was assuming that maybe my browser didn&#8217;t recognize settings or something like that.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lyricsboy/171300906/" title="An example of the way it should be."><img src="http://static.flickr.com/77/171300906_f0afd007e9_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Shakin' It" class="alignleft" /></a>
<p>I finally researched it this morning, and it turns out that <a href="http://www.flickr.com/forums/bugs/5520/27767/">it&#8217;s actually Flickr&#8217;s fault</a>. In order to save storage space (we assume), they strip <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_profile">color profile</a> data from (at least) all resized images. So while the originals might look as you expected, everyone who&#8217;s just looking at the resized versions is being misled.</p>
<p>A workaround has been discovered by smart people well before now, however &#8212; <a href="http://jiwhite.blogspot.com/2005/10/resolving-flickr-color-saturation-loss.html">convert your images to the sRGB colorspace before uploading</a>. Actually, using Adobe Bridge&#8217;s workflow options make this quite easy to do in the same step that I&#8217;m already doing to convert from Canon RAW to JPEG.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this convenient workaround is only useful when uploading new images to Flickr. As for the hundreds of shots I&#8217;ve already posted, the only way I can imagine to fix them is to manually re-upload and delete the existing ones. That seems like a huge pain. Maybe I can write an application using the Flickr API that will do this for me&#8230; but it seems unlikely to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ponystyle.com/blog/2006/06/20/flickr-vs-color-profiles-old-news-for-some/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

